Quantcast
Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56
Like Tree2Likes

Damn you, Microsoft

  1. #1
    Azhrei is offline Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    32

    Damn you, Microsoft

    Whenever I think about how Microsoft is trying to present networking in Vista and Windows 7, I get so angry I can't even formulate a proper post asking for help. I mean, what with all this crap about homegroups and public/private networking, having several different ways to go about setting folder permissions... whenever I think about it, I see red. It was so easy in XP by comparison. Setup the network wizard, create a name for the network, install the IPX protocol, and boom. Everything works as it should. Want to share a folder? Right-click, click on properties and select "Yes I want to share this folder on my unsecured network as far as you're concerned Microsoft now piss off" (or something to that effect) and it worked.

    When it comes to sharing folders in Vista, I have to create a new guest user and make them a co-owner, and still some machines give errors when trying to connect to these folders. By and large, however, it worked. Media sharing was also easy between two Vista machines and Media Centre. Not so with Windows 7. They seem to have added yet more options to the Network & Sharing Centre. I mean, what's a homegroup? How do I get the Vista and XP machines in the apartment to connect to this homegroup? What if I want to create a workgroup with trusty old XP on one machine? How do I tell Vista and 7 that I want to join that workgroup and ignore all their bull****tery about private sharing access? Renaming the network doesn't seem to do it. What's with the network map? Why does one Vista machine show up on it, but the other gives a message about how it can't be explained? And then there's the sharing folders option in 7. To be able to even access, without changing anything, a shared folder, I seem to have to go through several different windows as the os tries to tell me in a condescending manner that anyone who doesn't do things Microsoft's way is a retard.

    I right-click on a folder in 7. I select Share, and click apply. My Vista desktop can see it but not access it. I go back into the living room and attempt to set co-owner rights to the folder, except Microsoft have taken that bit out and replaced it with a read/write privilege for everyone. Except the Vista machine still cannot access the folder. Back into the living room again, this time heading for the security option after I right-click. Finally the Vista machine can access the folder, I can copy files into it and everything seems hunky dory. Except when I try to play a video file across the network, nothing happens. Zip. Same thing when I add those shared folders (where every possible option, of which there are several, to make sure that it is shared are selected) in Media Centre - just a black screen. Nothing happens. The red mist descends again. This is all because Microsoft just have to move in what looks like a more modern direction with homegroups and public networking and all that crap, and simply installing the IPX protocol and running a setup wizard just won't cut it these days.

    Argh, I've tried to post about my problems with networking in Vista and 7, and again it's turned into a huge rant. Godammit, I hate you, Microsoft! One of the best things about the media pc in the living room was being able to store all of our media on a terabyte hard drive and being able to watch whatever I want in my bedroom, either wirelessly with my laptop or over the wired router on my desktop. Now I can't do this simple task because Microsoft have ****ed up the network options so badly in their attempts to make it "easier" and "clearer to understand even for retard doofuses like yourself, Azhrei. You doofus."

    Why do they have to keep moving in a direction that actually makes it harder to network?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    iroken22 is offline Senior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    823
    Actually Microsoft has made it quite easier to network if you know what your doing. One of the biggest things about folder sharing in XP was the fact that you shared a file and everyone could access it. This was a security vulnerability. In VISTA they fixed that and made it so you can control who sees what. It is not the fact that they are making it harder they are just making it more secure.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Azhrei is offline Member Thread Starter Thread Starter
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by iroken22 View Post
    Actually Microsoft has made it quite easier to network if you know what your doing. One of the biggest things about folder sharing in XP was the fact that you shared a file and everyone could access it. This was a security vulnerability. In VISTA they fixed that and made it so you can control who sees what. It is not the fact that they are making it harder they are just making it more secure.
    In Vista, sharing folders across a network worked for the most part. The same goes for 7. After swearing blindly at the media pc for several days now, I still can't watch a video across the network, whether over wireless or wired ethernet. How is it easier to network if you have to know what it entails? That's pretty much the opposite of easy, quick access, isn't it? All I want to do is share a folder. I don't want Microsoft to dictate whether the folder or the network is secure or not, I just want to share the damn folder.

    But, no. That just won't do, Microsoft appear to say.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Obsidian is offline Junior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    20
    Sharing on XP on my own network? No problem. Takes 5secs, 10 at most.
    Sharing on my Vista Laptop on my own network? I gave up 2 months ago, feeling rather stupid and aggrevated. Microsoft may have made it more secure, but for the average home user, it's a tedious and silly setup.
    I seem to have got 7 to network a bit, but only when it feels like it. Not when I need it to.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Azhrei is offline Member Thread Starter Thread Starter
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    32
    Ah, another victim. To share a folder in Vista, right-click on it, select properties, then select share, and yes. Then, in the same properties window, you have to edit user permissions. Click on the list and select guest, then click add. Click on the right side of the new guest user, and select co-owner. Bingo, the folder is shared properly now over the 'network. If only it was as easy in Windows 7 >_<

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Obsidian is offline Junior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    20
    Ah, thanks. I thought it was the password sharing thingy or w/e. Anyhoo, works properly now.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    iroken22 is offline Senior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    823
    Microsoft made Windows 7 the way they did to enhance security mainly. You must not realize how big of a security threat on a network a shared folder that everyone can view is. Especially corporate sized networks. This makes it easier for network admins to ensure that the folders on the network are properly secured. I just asked a friend of mine and he concurs with what i am saying. There are aspects of the model Microsoft uses that make complete since to me. then there are other aspects that could use a little improvement.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Obsidian is offline Junior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    20
    Oh, I understand how much of a threat it is on a network on a corporate scale, don't get me wrong. The thing is, I don't want to jumpo through all these rings of fire just to share my stuff with my other stuff. I live by myself in my own appartment on a wired network with no wireless access. I just want to share my stuff with me, and in this case, the way Microsoft took networking from XP to 7 is just stupid. Atleast change the options on the different network levels. Import all the security stuff you like into the work network center, and give us a really basic, trimmed down version of it in the home network center.

    I understand all to well what happens within companies when networks are manipulated and I think that for companies, it's getting better and better. For the single home users such as myself? It's getting harder and harder.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Azhrei is offline Member Thread Starter Thread Starter
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    32
    Businesses would surely be using Vista Enterprise, not Vista Home Basic or Premium. I do realise how Microsoft is trying to make Windows as secure as can be, but they are just making it difficult for people who are buying the Home versions. I mean, the very name suggests that that version of the os is not going to be used in many businesses. I appreciate that Microsoft also want to protect user's computers on unsecured networks, say with laptop owners using wi-fi. I do not appreciate Microsoft trying to secure my computers from my own network in my own home.

    It's none of their business if the network at my apartment is secured or not, and I wish they'd put an option in there to tell the ultra paranoid Network & Sharing Centre to piss off and leave me alone, and to - gasp! - share whatever folders I want with other computers.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    sardog12 is offline Junior Member
    Enjoys Windows 7 Forums
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    15
    Remember that you are beta testing the Windows 7 ULTIMATE, not the Home Ed. or Basic Ed. I don't know what features that edition will or won't have or if it will have relaxed security or not as Microsoft hasn't announced that, as far as I know. However, it is unreasonable to expect MS to have relaxed security on the Ultimate Ed. If you don't want to work around the features of a Beta OS, I suggest you go back to whatever you were working with before.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. That Sandvich Is A Damn Good Cop
    By whoosh in forum The Water Cooler
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 12:53 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 02:20 PM
  3. The Charlie Sheen is Too Damn High Party
    By whoosh in forum The Water Cooler
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2011, 02:40 AM
  4. Blue damn screens
    By skeptic in forum Windows 7 Support
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-13-2010, 01:02 PM
  5. Blue damn screen
    By skeptic in forum Windows 7 Support
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-21-2010, 03:28 PM

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Search engine data is still being processed!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •